Buena lectura - Gender-Specific Reproductive Tissue in...

Espacio diseñado para comentar asuntos relaciados a los comienzos del mundo y su 'creación' desde los puntos de vista 'Bíblico' y/ o 'Cientíico'.

Nota: Creemos en el "Diseño Inteligente"

Moderators: VidaEterna!, Asistente

Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: :USA:

Buena lectura - Gender-Specific Reproductive Tissue in...

Post by Clarice » Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:52 pm

Este artícul* no es fácil de conseguir gente, les aconsejo que lo copien, empasten e impriman, si la buscan por su lado, será a un costo monetario. Es información para los que creen en la tierra nueva, y claro para los que creen en la tierra vieja, para lectura adicional..

En fin acá les vá :)




Traducción al español es posible usando este enlace

Gender-Specific Reproductive Tissue in Ratites and Tyrannosaurus rex

Mary H. Schweitzer,1,2,3* Jennifer L. Wittmeyer,1 John R. Horner3
Unambiguous indicators of gender in dinosaurs are usually lost during fossilization, along with other aspects of soft tissue anatomy. We report the presence of endosteally derived bone tissues lining the interior marrow cavities of portions of Tyrannosaurus rex (Museum of the Rockies specimen number 1125) hindlimb elements, and we hypothesize that these tissues are homologous to specialized avian tissues known as medullary bone. Because medullary bone is unique to female birds, its discovery in extinct dinosaurs solidifies the link between dinosaurs and birds, suggests similar reproductive strategies, and provides an objective means of gender differentiation in dinosaurs.

1 Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
2 North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA.
3 Museum of the Rockies, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.

A relatively small (femur length, 107 cm) Tyrannosaurus rex [Museum of the Rockies (MOR) specimen number 1125] was discovered at the base of the Hell Creek Formation (dated at 70 million years ago) as an association of disarticulated elements with excellent preservation (1). At death, MOR 1125 was estimated to be 18 ± 2 years (2), on the basis of lines of arrested growth (LAG).


View Larger Version of this Image - Figure 1-

Interior femur fragments from MOR 1125 were reserved without preservatives for chemical and molecular analyses. Gross examination revealed a thin layer of bone tissue lining the inner (medullary) surfaces of the bone fragments that was structurally distinct from other described bone types (Fig. 1D) but possessed characteristics in common with avian medullary bone (MB).
MB is an ephemeral tissue, deposited on the endosteal surface of avian long bones (3–10). Its formation in female birds is triggered by increasing levels of gonadal hormones produced upon ovulation (4, 10, 11), but it can also be artificially induced in male birds by the administration of estrogen (3, 4, 12). Because MB is densely mineralized and extremely well vascularized, it provides an easily mobilized source of calcium necessary for the production of calcareous eggshells (13). We compare MB from emu and ostrich (14) at different stages of the laying cycle with newly identified dinosaur tissues, because these basal birds share more primitive features with nonavian dinosaurs than do extant neognaths (15–18).
Our investigations show that ratite MB differs from that seen in better-studied neognaths. We observed substantial variation between emu and ostrich MB tissues and between both ratites and reported neognath tissues (Fig. 1 and fig. S1). MB (Fig. 1) may be thick (chicken and ostrich) or quite thin (emu) at midshaft; and it may be separated by a distinct layer of endosteal laminar bone (ELB) as described by Chinsamy et al. (19) (chicken and emu), or not (ostrich). The innermost layer of MB in the ostrich [adjacent to the endosteal surface of cortical bone (CB)] appears to arise from dense sheets to form tubular structures that parallel the long axis of the bone (Fig. 1I). Thin hairlike spicules (Fig. 1C) of mineralized bone protrude from the tubes and may be intimately involved in their formation from the basal layer. Mineralized spicules were also noted arising from emu MB (fig. S2), but the tubelike structures were not so apparent or distinct. The MB tissues are morphologically distinct from overlying CB and are similarly distributed in both dinosaur (Fig. 1D) and ratite (Fig. 1, E and F) samples. Higher magnifications of T. rex (Fig. 1G) and ratite (Fig. 1, H and I) tissues show the open, crystalline, and fibrous structure of these highly vascular tissues, in contrast to the denser CB.
In a fresh fracture, dense and relatively homogenous dinosaur CB is distinct from the loosely organized and highly vascular MB internal to it (Fig. 2A). A distinct layer corresponding to ELB (19) separates the two bone types. A large erosion room is visible at this boundary, lined with laminar tissue. An emu bone fragment (Fig. 2B) in similar orientation shows MB tissues with a distinctive, less organized and "crumbly" texture relative to overlying CB. It is interspersed with or laid down between large erosion rooms within the deep cortex and ELB of the tibial shaft. The dense cortex and laminar structure of the ELB are easily distinguished from surrounding MB. The ostrich MB (Fig. 2C) differs in both texture and orientation, with open cavities that are bordered by tubelike bone spicules.
View Larger Version of this Image - Figure 2-

The lacy vascularity of the T. rex tissues (Fig. 2D) is consistent with the larger vascular canals and whorled pattern of the emu (Fig. 2E) and especially with the ostrich (Fig. 2F), where wide blood-filled sinuses separate forming bone spicules. In ground section (Fig. 2G), MOR 1125 femur cortical bone is characterized by well-developed multigeneration Haversian systems with obvious and defined cement lines, supporting a mature status for this dinosaur (2). A region of decreased vascularity and laminar structure marks the ELB. In contrast, the medullary tissues arising from the ELB are densely vascularized but show no evidence of Haversian remodeling or cement lines, indicating that this tissue is newly deposited, or younger bone. A fresh cut section of emu bone (Fig. 2H) in comparable orientation shows dense CB and vascular, crystalline, and loosely organized MB, separated by a thin, dense, and less vascular ELB. MB in the ostrich (Fig. 2I) is more extensive than in the emu samples, most likely because shelling had not yet begun (14). No distinct ELB is visible. MB appears laminar rather than spiculated in Fig. 2I, because the tubules formed by bony spicules are oriented longitudinally rather than in cross section as in Fig. 2F, but it is the same tissue.
Additional pattern similarities are seen in demineralized (14) ratite (Fig. 3, B and C) and T. rex (Fig. 3A) medullary tissues. In all cases, the matrix is fibrous and randomly organized. The reddish color in extant tissues is due to blood retained in sinuses that separate the bone spicules. The T. rex tissues are similarly pigmented, due either to diagenetic alteration or to close association of bony tissues with blood-producing marrow during the life of the dinosaur.


View Larger Version of this Image - Figure 3-

In all MB tissues shown, large vascular sinuses are easily discerned (Fig. 3, D to F), but in the T. rex, vascular openings are surrounded by circumferentially oriented matrix fibers (Fig. 3D) that are less apparent in extant bone. The ostrich medullary tissues are denser than either the emu (Fig. 3E) or T. rex samples, particularly closer to the cortex, but the variation in the size and density of vascular sinuses (Fig. 3F) is similar to that seen in the T. rex tissues. In planar view, MOR 1125 undemineralized tissues show a random orientation of fibers, and vascular openings penetrate deep into the tissues (Fig. 3G, inset) and exhibit an unusual doublet or triplet pattern, where multiple vessels penetrate an osteonlike core (arrows), also seen in the emu (Fig. 3H, arrows). The ostrich medullary tissues (Fig. 3I) are more variable, denser, and less random in appearance than those of the emu, but the morphology changes as the tissues extend into the medullary cavity. Close to the cortex (Fig. 3I, inset, and fig. S3), the bone is sheetlike, relatively dense, and punctured by vascular sinuses exhibiting the doublet pattern (arrows) noted above. As tissues extend into the medullary cavity (Fig. 3I), this pattern becomes obscured. Inset bone has been stained (14) for better contrast.
In regions of MOR 1125 bone where most of the medullary tissues have eroded (Fig. 3J), patches of denser CB can be seen, emphasizing the random mazelike pattern and large vascular sinuses of medullary tissues, a pattern also seen in the emu bone (Fig. 3K). The ostrich MB shows a similar pattern of bony spicules surrounding large and small blood sinuses (Fig. 3L).
Scanning electron micrographs (14) reveal the distinctive grainy texture and disorganized morphology of demineralized T. rex and avian MB (Fig. 4). This contrasts with the smooth and fibrous texture of demineralized CB from the same specimens (Fig. 4, E to H). Higher magnifications of demineralized CB (Fig. 4, I to K) emphasize the smooth, fibrous, and more ordered nature of all specimens, although in MOR 1125 (Fig. 4I), degradation is apparent.
View Larger Version of this Image - Figure 4-

MB occurs naturally only in extant female birds, although it varies in amount and distribution among taxa and with ovulatory phase (5, 20). It is chemically, functionally, and structurally distinct from both overlying CB and internal trabecular bone (21, 22). Although "medullary" and "trabecular" bone are terms often used interchangeably in the literature, MB has a larger surface area and is more vascular than other bone types, allowing rapid calcium mobilization (5). It is more highly mineralized, with a greater apatite-to-collagen ratio (5, 7, 20–22), and incorporates acidic mucopolysaccharides and glycosaminoglycans that are not present in CB (5, 11). Additionally, the matrix of MB is higher in noncollagenous proteins and lower in collagen, and has a higher collagen III–to–collagen I ratio (22) relative to other bone types. If preservation allows, these characteristics will be used as part of ongoing research to chemically distinguish the two bone types in this dinosaur.
The existence of avian-type MB in dinosaurs has been hypothesized (9, 23) but not identified. In part, this could be because of taphonomic bias, because the death and fossilization of an ovulating dinosaur would be comparatively rare. Additionally, MB in extant birds is fragile, the spicules separating easily from the originating layer (fig. S1). Dinosaur MB may separate and be lost from overlying CB in a similar manner during diagenesis.
The location, origin, morphology, and microstructure of the new T. rex tissues support homology with ratite MB. The T. rex tissues line the medullary cavities of both femora of MOR 1125, suggesting an organismal response. The tissues are similar in distribution to those of extant ratites, being more extensive in proximal regions of the bone. They are clearly endosteal in origin, and the microstructure with large vascular sinuses is consistent with the function of MB as a rapidly deposited and easily mobilized calcium source. The random, woven character indicates rapidly deposited, younger bone. Finally, the robustly supported relationship between theropods and extant birds (15–18, 24, 25) permits the application of phylogenetic inference to support the identification of these tissues (26, 27).
The morphology of these dinosaur tissues is not identical to that of extant neognaths (fig. S1), but is more similar to that seen in ratites. T. rex medullary tissues are less extensive than those reported for neognaths, which may be explained by many factors. First, there is a wide range of MB morphologies in extant taxa (20), varying with both reproductive phase and the position of the egg within the reproductive tract (6). Medullary tissues become thinner as shelling progresses and disappear completely with deposition of the last egg. If the same was true of dinosaurs, MOR 1125 may have died toward the end of the laying cycle. Second, MB in extant birds is hypothesized to provide a buffer against excessive and debilitating bone resorption during shelling (4, 28). It is most extensive in smaller taxa with high reproductive rates, because of the demand for rapid mobilization of skeletal calcium for shelling. Extinct theropods produced hard-shelled eggs, as did other dinosaurs and all extant birds (29, 30). Although egg size is not known, eggs were most likely smaller relative to overall body size than in extant birds, resulting in less demand for bone calcium reserves and reducing the need to offset resorption. These factors may also contribute to the smaller ratio of medullary to cortical thickness in theropods than in extant birds. Finally, T. rex, although phylogenetically close to extant birds (15–18, 24, 25), was distinct in size, biomechanical constraints, and, to some degree, physiology (31); therefore, slight variations in bone and tissue types would be expected.
MB most likely first evolved within the lineage in early, small theropods with high productivity. A relatively thicker tyrannosaur bone cortex would reduce the need for MB, and its presence in MOR 1125 may reflect the retention of a primitive trait. This hypothesis may be tested by examination of the limb bones of the recently reported oviraptor containing eggs in the reproductive tract (32).
The existence of MB in crocodiles has been referred to anecdotally (3, 21), but although they do resorb CB during shelling, experimental evidence suggests that they do not form MB (6, 9, 11, 12), even after stimulation with estrogen (33). The identification of medullary tissues in dinosaurs supports a closer relationship to birds than to other extant archosaurs, sheds light on reproductive strategies of nonavian theropods, and provides an objective means of gender determination in extinct dinosaurs.[/url]
Last edited by Clarice on Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:29 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: :USA:

References and Notes

Post by Clarice » Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:50 pm

References and Notes

1. M. H. Schweitzer, J. L. Wittmeyer, J. R. Horner, J. A. Toporski, Science 307, 1952 (2005).[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. J. R. Horner, K. Padian, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 271, 1875 (2004). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]

3. T. Yamamoto, H. Nakamura, T. Tsuji, A. Hirata, Anat. Rec. 264, 25 (2001). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]

4. S. C. Miller, B. M. Bowman, Dev. Biol. 87, 52 (1981). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]

5. C. G. Dacke et al., J. Exp. Biol. 184, 63 (1993).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. M. A. Bloom, L. V. Domm, A. V. Nalbandov, W. Bloom, Am. J. Anat. 102, 411 (1958). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]

7. T. G. Taylor, K. Simkiss, D. A. Stringer, in Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl (Volume 2), D. J. Bell, B. M. Freeman, Eds. (Academic Press, London, 1971), pp. 621–640.

8. E. Bonucci, G. Gherardi, Cell Tissue Res. 163, 81 (1975). [ISI] [Medline]

9. A. Chinsamy, P. M. Barrett, J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 17, 450 (1997). [ISI]
10. A. Ascenzi, C. Francois, D. S. Bocciarelli, J. Ultrastruct. Res. 8, 491 (1963). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]

11. T. Sugiyama, S. Kusuhara, Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 82 (2001).

12. T. Ohashi, S. Kusuhara, K. Ishida, Br. Poult. Sci. 28, 727 (1987). [ISI] [Medline]

13. J. L. Arias, M. S. Fernandez, World's Poult. Sci. J. 57, 349 (2001). [ISI]

14. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.

15. J. A. Gauthier, Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci. 8, 1 (1986).

16. L. M. Chiappe, Nature 378, 349 (1995). [CrossRef] [ISI]

17. K. Padian, L. M. Chiappe, Sci. Am. 278, 38 (1998). [Medline]

18. J. Cracraft, J. A. Clarke, in New Perspectives on the Origin and Early Evolution of Birds. Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of J. H. Ostrom, J. Gauthier, L. F. Gall, Eds. (Special Publication of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, CT, 2001), pp. 143–147.
19. A. Chinsamy, L. M. Chiappe, P. Dodson, Paleobiology 21, 561 (1995). [ISI]

20. H. Schraer, S. J. Hunter, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 82, 13 (1985). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]

21. C. C. Whitehead, Poult. Sci. 83, 193 (2004). [ISI] [Medline]
22. L. Knott, A. J. Bailey, Br. Poult. Sci. 40, 371 (1999). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]

23. D. M. Martill, M. J. Barker, C. G. Dacke, Nature 379, 778 (1996).

24. C. A. Forster, S. D. Sampson, L. M. Chiappe, D. W. Krause, Science 279, 1915 (1998).[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. P. C. Sereno, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 25, 435 (1997). [CrossRef] [ISI]

26. H. N. Bryant, A. P. Russell, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 337, 405 (1992). [ISI]

27. L. M. Witmer, in Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology, J. J. Thomason, Ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1995), pp. 19–33.

28. S. Wilson, B. H. Thorpe, Calcif. Tissue Int. 62, 506 (1998). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]

29. K. Carpenter, Ed., Eggs, Nests, and Baby Dinosaurs: A Look at Dinosaur Reproduction (Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, IN, 1999).

30. K. E. Mikhailov, Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 56, 1 (1997).

31. M. H. Schweitzer, C. L. Marshall, J. Exp. Zoolog. Part B Mol. Dev. Evol. 291, 317 (2001). [CrossRef]

32. T. Sato, Y. Chang, X. Wu, D. Zelenitsky, Y. Hsiao, Science 308, 375.

33. R. M. Elsey, C. S. Wink, Comp. Biochem. Biophys. 84A, 107 (1986).

34. We thank C. Ancell, J. Barnes, D. Enlow, J. Flight, A. Friederichs, B.
Harmon, L. Knott, E. Lamm, N. Myrhvold, A. de Ricqles, A. Steele, and T. Sugiyama for insight and assistance, and D. Brown (Carlhaven Farms) and J. Perkins (Perkins Ostrich) for ratite specimens. R. Avci (Image and Chemical Analysis Laboratory, Montana State University) and M. Dykstra [Laboratory for Advanced Electron and Light Optical Methods, North Carolina State University (NCSU) College of Veterinary Medicine] provided scanning electron microscope access. We also thank J. Fountain and K. Padian for editorial advice. The ground section of MOR 1125 was provided by Quality Thin Sections, and the laying hen demineralized thin sections were provided by J. Barnes (NCSU College of Veterinary Medicine). Site access was provided by the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge. The research was funded


Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:09 pm
Location: Puerto Rico

Post by Toruresu » Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:08 pm

Saludos en el Señor;

A ver si entiendo...este estudio trata de probar cómo los dinosaurios (almenos el T-Rex) se reproducían, y definitivamente está a favor de la evolución. ¿Cierto o mi lectura fue incorrecta? Me baso en esto;

The lacy vascularity of the T. rex tissues (Fig. 2D) is consistent with the larger vascular canals and whorled pattern of the emu (Fig. 2E) and especially with the ostrich (Fig. 2F), where wide blood-filled sinuses separate forming bone spicules. In ground section (Fig. 2G), MOR 1125 femur cortical bone is characterized by well-developed multigeneration Haversian systems with obvious and defined cement lines, supporting a mature status for this dinosaur (2). A region of decreased vascularity and laminar structure marks the ELB. In contrast, the medullary tissues arising from the ELB are densely vascularized but show no evidence of Haversian remodeling or cement lines, indicating that this tissue is newly deposited, or younger bone.

MB most likely first evolved within the lineage in early, small theropods with high productivity.

Y otras partes. ¿Déjame saber, ok?

Hno. José
Romanos 9:16 "Así­ que no es del que quiere, ni del que corre, sino de Dios que tiene misericordia."

Post Reply